The restriction does exist. Sorry, I looked a couple of days ago at the IRTC
page and started looked at the pics and stuff (can we lynch Gillis?) and the
new subject stuff.

Tom Melly wrote:

> "Rick" <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote in message news:39587ac6@news.povray.org...
> > i thaught that the wilderness topic was supposed to be devoid of ppl?, or
> do
> > stormtroupers just not count?
> >
>
> !? - I'd be suprised if such a restriction exists, AFAIK it would certainly
> be a first for the IRTC to set such a rule on a theme.
>
> To my mind "wilderness" is a subjective term anyway. A wilderness needs an
> observer, either in the scene (the stormtroopers), or the viewer of the
> picture (you), or both.
>
> An ocean, a forest - these are things that exist whether we look at them or
> not. "Wilderness" is much more to do with our perception of something,
> rather than any underlying physical attribute of the thing itself. It is an
> expression of our attitude towards a place, rather than a place of itself
> (IMHO).

Post a reply to this message